Airline Hydraulics Blog

Four Common Machine Safety Mistakes You Should Watch For

Written by Ryan Hayworth | Mar 26, 2026 6:12:29 PM

Machine safety issues rarely come from a single missing component. More often, they come from small design decisions that didn’t fully account for how the machine operates, how people interact with it, or how the system evolves over time.

Machines are modified. Production speeds increase. New automation is added. Over time, safety systems that once worked well may no longer match the way the equipment is actually used. Across many facilities, the same machine safety challenges tend to appear again and again.

Here are several common machine safety mistakes engineers and safety teams should watch for—and why they matter.

 

 

Table of Contents (Jump to a Section) 

Treating Risk Assessment Like Paperwork  |  Installing Guarding Without Considering Stopping Time  |  Evaluate Electrical Enclosure Requirements  |   Missing or Incomplete Machine Safety Documentation  |   Have A Machine Safety Question?  |  Ask A TUV-Certified Safety Engineer  |  Additional Resources

 

1. Treating Risk Assessments Like Paperwork

Risk assessments are sometimes treated as a form that must be completed for compliance. In reality, the risk assessment is what should drive the entire safety design. 

 A proper machine safety risk assessment evaluates:

- The hazards present on the machine

- The severity of potential injuries

- How often workers are exposed to the hazard

- Whether the hazard can realistically be avoided

 

Those factors determine the level of risk reduction required and influence decisions about guarding, sensors, safety controls, and operating procedures. When risk assessments are skipped or completed after safeguards are installed, safety systems often become reactive instead of engineered.


Risk assessments are especially important when:

- Installing new equipment

- Modifying existing machines

- Adding automation or robotics

- Changing operator interaction with equipment

 

 2. Installing Guarding Without Considering Stopping Time 


Guarding and presence-sensing devices are commonly installed to prevent access to hazardous areas. However, the effectiveness of many safeguards depends on machine stopping time.

For example, a light curtain may stop the machine when the beam is broken. But the protective distance between the light curtain and the hazard must allow enough time for the machine to stop completely before a person can reach the danger point.

If the stopping time is longer than expected, the protective device may be positioned too close to the hazard.

 

Stopping time can change over time due to factors such as:

- Mechanical wear

- Brake degradation

- Increased production speeds

- Machine modifications

 

Without measuring and verifying stopping time, it is difficult to confirm that safeguarding devices are positioned correctly.

 

3. Overlooking Whole-Body Access and Exclusive Control

Many safeguards are designed to prevent someone from reaching a hazard. But when a person can fully enter a machine area, the safety strategy must change. This situation is known as whole-body access.

 

Examples include:

  • Robotic cells
  • Automated packaging systems
  • Large machine enclosures

 

When workers can enter a safeguarded area, it becomes critical to ensure they have exclusive control over machine restart. Without that protection, someone outside the area may be able to reset or restart the machine while another worker is still inside.

Solutions such as trapped key systems, double reset systems, and presence detection devices are often used to prevent unintended restarts in these situations.

 

4. Missing or Incomplete Machine Safety Documentation

Machine safety systems are much easier to maintain and evaluate when proper documentation is available. However, older machines often have incomplete records. Over time, equipment may be upgraded, repaired, or modified without updating the documentation.

 

 Important machine safety records may include:

- Machine safety risk assessments

- Safety circuit diagrams

- Safety device specifications

- Stopping-time measurements

- Validation test results

- Records of machine modifications

- Preventative maintenance documentation

 

This documentation helps engineers and safety professionals confirm that the installed safeguards match the intended safety design. It also becomes extremely valuable during inspections, system upgrades, or troubleshooting.

Without it, teams may have difficulty determining whether the safety system still meets current safety requirements. 

 

Have a Machine Safety Question?

Every facility has unique machines, processes, and safety challenges. Sometimes the best way to move forward is to hear how experienced safety professionals approach real-world situations.

Register to attend or view the on-demand webinar. 

Machine Safety Office Hours — Ask a TÜV-Certified Safety Engineer

 

In this 60-minute session, a TÜV-certified Functional Safety Engineer discusses common machine safety issues and answers questions on topics like:

  • Risk assessments and compliance
  • Guarding and interlocks
  • Light curtains and safety sensors
  • Safety controls and performance levels
  • Validation and documentation


Additional Resources

Register to Attend or View the On-Demand Webinar

More Machine Safety Blogs

More information on MPSA Website

Shop Machine Safety Products